首页> 外文OA文献 >Socio-economic variations in the mental health treatment gap for people with anxiety, mood, and substance use disorders: results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH)\ud surveys
【2h】

Socio-economic variations in the mental health treatment gap for people with anxiety, mood, and substance use disorders: results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH)\ud surveys

机译:焦虑,情绪和物质使用障碍者的心理健康治疗差距的社会经济差异:WHO世界心理健康(WMH)的结果\ ud 调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: The treatment gap between the number of people with mental disorders and the number treated represents a major public health challenge. We examine this gap by socio economic status (SES; indicated by family income and respondent education) and service sector in a cross-national analysis of community epidemiological survey data. Methods: Data come from 16,753 respondents with 12-month DSM-IV disorders from community surveys in 25 countries in the WHO World Mental Health Survey Initiative. DSM-IV\udanxiety, mood, or substance disorders and treatment of these disorders were assessed with the WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI).\udResults: Only 13.7% of 12-month DSM-IV/CIDI cases in lower-middle-income countries, 22.0% in upper-middle-income countries, and 36.8% in high-income countries received treatment. Highest-SES respondents were somewhat more likely to receive treatment, but this was true mostly for specialty mental health treatment, where the association was positive witH education (highest treatment among respondents with highest education and a weak association\ud178 of education with treatment among other respondents) but non-monotonic with income (somewhat lower treatment rates among middle-income respondents and equivalent among those with high and low incomes).\udConclusions: The modest, but nonetheless stronger, association of education than income with treatment raises questions about a financial barriers interpretation of the inverse association ofSES with treatment, although future within-country analyses that consider contextual factors\udmight document other important specifications. While beyond the scope of this report, such an expanded analysis could have important implications for designing interventions aimed at increasing mental disorder treatment among socio-economically disadvantaged people.
机译:背景:精神障碍患者人数与所治疗人数之间的治疗差距是一项重大的公共卫生挑战。我们在对社区流行病学调查数据进行跨国分析时,通过社会经济地位(SES;家庭收入和受访者的教育程度)和服务部门来研究这种差距。方法:数据来自世卫组织世界心理健康调查倡议组织在25个国家进行的社区调查的16753名患有12个月DSM-IV疾病的受访者。 DSM-IV \ udanxiety,情绪或物质障碍以及这些疾病的治疗情况均通过WHO综合国际诊断访谈(CIDI)进行了评估。\ ud结果:中低等人群的12个月DSM-IV / CIDI病例仅占13.7%收入国家,中高收入国家为22.0%,高收入国家为36.8%。 SES最高的受访者更有可能接受治疗,但这在专科心理健康治疗中尤其如此,在这种情况下,教育与教育的关联是积极的(受教育程度最高的受访者中待遇最高,而教育与治疗之间的关联性弱\ ud178被调查者),但收入却非单调(中等收入被调查者的治疗率略低,高收入和低收入者的治疗率相当)。\ ud结论:教育比收入与治疗的联系适度但更强,这引发了关于金融障碍解释了SES与治疗的逆相关性,尽管考虑到情境因素的未来国家内部分析\武力证明了其他重要指标。尽管超出了本报告的范围,但这种扩展的分析可能对设计旨在增加社会经济弱势群体中的精神障碍治疗的干预措施具有重要意义。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号